بحوث دراسة الحالة

المراجع 369 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. ) 1997 ( . The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Lee, E., Mishna, F., & Brennenstuhl, S. ) 2010 ( . How to critically evaluate case studies in social work. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 682–689. • Lempert, L. B. )2011(. Asking q ue stions of the data: Memo writing in the grounded theory tradition. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz )Eds.(, The Sage handbook of grounded theory )pp. 245– 264(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V ., & Giese, M. A. ) 2006 ( . Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572–575. • Lewins, A., & Silver, C. )2007(. Using software in q u alitative research: A step-by-step guide. London: Sage. • Liebow, E. )1967(. Tally’s c orner. Boston: Little, Brown. • Lijphart, A. ) 1975 ( . The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 158–177. • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. )1985(. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams )Ed.(, Naturalistic evaluation ) pp. 73–84 ( . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Lipset, S. M., Trow, M., & Coleman, J. )1956(. Union democracy: The inside politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press. • Lipsey, M. W . )1990(. Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Lipsey, M. W . )1992(. Meta-analysis in evaluation research: Moving from description to explanation. In H. T. Chen & P . Rossi )Eds.(, Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations )pp. 229–241 ( . New York: Greenwood. • Llewellyn, K. N. )1948(. Case method. In E. Seligman & A. Johnson )Eds.(, Encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan. • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. )1929(. Middletown: A study in modern American culture. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. • Lynd, R. S., & Lynd, H. M. ) 1937 ( . Middletown in transition: A study in cultural conflicts. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. • Magaziner, I. C., & Patinkin, M. )1989(. The silent war: Inside the global business battles shaping America’s future. New York: Random House.

المراجع 370 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Mark, M. M. )2008(. Building a better evidence base for evaluation theory. In N. L. Smith & P . R. Brandon )Eds.(, Fundamental issues in evaluation )pp. 111– 134 ( . New York: Guilford. • Markus, M. L. ) 1983 ( . Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 430– 444. • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. ) 2011 ( . Designing q ualitative research ) 5th ed. ( . Newbury Park, CA: Sage. • Marwell, N. P . )2007(. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • McAdams, D. R. ) 2000 ( . Fighting to save our urban schools . . . and winning! Lessons from Houston. New York: Teachers College Press. • McClintock, C. ) 1985 ( . Process sampling: A method for case study research on administrative behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 205–222. • McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. C. ) 2007 ( . Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 8– 15. • McNemar, Q. )1946(. Opinion-attitude methodology. Psychological Bulletin, 43, 289– 374. • Mertens, D. )2010( . Research and evaluation in education and psychology ) 3rd ed. ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Merton, R. K., Fiske, M., & Kendall, P . L. )1990(. The focused interview: A manual of problems and procedures )2nd ed.(. New York: Free Press. • Meyer, C. B. )2001(. A case in case study methodology. Field Methods, 13, 329– 352. • Michel, J.-B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P ., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team, et al. )2010(. Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176–182. • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. )1994(. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. ) Eds. ( . ) 2010a ( . Encyclopedia of case study research ) 2 vols. ( . Los Angeles: Sage. • Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. ) 2010b ( . Introduction. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos, & E. Wiebe )Eds.(, Encyclopedia of case study research )pp. xxxi–xxxvi(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Mitchell, J. C. )1983(. Case and situation analysis. Sociological Review, 31, 187– 211. • Miyahara, M., & Wafer, A. )2004(. Clinical intervention for children with developmental coordination disorder: A multiple case study. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 21, 281–300.

المراجع 371 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Moore, B., Jr. ) 1966 ( . Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston: Beacon. • Morgan, D. L., & Morgan, R. K. )2009(. Single-case research methods for the behavioral and health sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Morris, L. L., Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., & Freeman, M. E. ) 1987 ( . How to communicate evaluation findings. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. • Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. L. ) 1984( . Applied Bayesian and classical inference: The case of ” The Federalist“ papers ) 2nd ed. ( . New York: Springer Verlag. • Mulroy, E. A., & Lauber, H. ) 2004 ( . A user-friendly approach to program evaluation and effective community interventions for families at risk of homelessness. Social Work, 49, 573–586. • Murphy, J. T. )1980(. Getting the facts: A fieldwork guide for evaluators and policy analysts. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear. • Murray, D. M. )1998(. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press. • Nachmias, D., & Nachmias, C. )1992(. Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St. Martin’s. • Nathan, I., Lund, J. F., Gausset, Q., & Andersen, S. K. )2007(. On the promise of devolution: Overcoming the constraints of natural resource management in a village in Tanzania. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 6, 1– 20. • National Research Council. )2003(. Protecting participants and facilitating social and behavioral sciences research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. • National Research Council. )2004(. On evaluating curricular effectiveness: Judging the q u ality of K–12 mathematics evaluations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. • Naumes, W ., & Naumes, M. J. )1999(. The art & craft of case writing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Nesman, T. M., Batsche, C., & Hernandez, M. ) 2007 ( . Theory-based evaluation of a comprehensive Latino education initiative: An interactive evaluation approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 267– 281. • Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. )2001(. Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 8– 26. • Neustadt, R. E., & Fineberg, H. )1983(. The epidemic that never was: Policy-making and the swine flu affair. New York: Vintage.

المراجع 372 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • O’Reilly, K. ) 2005 (. Ethnographic methods. London: Routledge. Patton, M. Q. ) 2002 ( . Qualitative research and evaluation methods )3rd ed.(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Peters, T. J., & Waterman, R. H., Jr. )1982(. In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row. • Peterson, K. A., & Bickman, L. )1992(. Using program theory in qu ality assessments of children’s mental health services. In H. T. Chen & P . Rossi )Eds.(, Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations )pp. 165– 176 ( . New York: Greenwood. • Peterson, R. K. )2001(. On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 450–461. • Philliber, S. G., Schwab, M. R., & Samsloss, G. )1980(. Social research: Guides to a decision-making process. Itasca, IL: Peacock. • Phillips, R., & Pittman, R. H. )2009( . A framework for community and economic development. In R.Phillips & R. H. Pittman ) Eds. ( , An introduction to community development ) pp. 3–19 ( . Abingdon, England: Routledge. • Piekkari, R., Welch, C., & Paavilainen, E. ) 2009 ( . The case study as disciplinary convention: Evidence from international business jo urnals. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 567–589. • Platt, J. )1992(. ”Case study“ in American methodological thought. Current Sociology, 40, 17–48. • Prescott, H. M. )2002(. Using the student body: College and university students as research subje cts in the United States during the twentieth century. Journal of the History of Medicine, 57, 3–38. • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. )1973(. Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press. • Ragin, C. C. ) 1987 ( . The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. • Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. )Eds.(. ) 1992 ( . What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press. • Raizen, S. A., & Britton, E. D. )Eds.(. )1997(. Bold ventures )3 vols.(. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. • Randolph, J. J., & Eronen, P . J. ) 2007 ( . Developing the Learner Door: A case study in youth participatory program planning. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 55– 65. • Redman, E. )1973(. The dance of legislation. New York: Simon & Schuster. • Rihoux, B., & Lobe, B. )2009(. The case for q u alitative comparative analysis ) QCA ( : Adding leverage for thick cross-case comparison. In D. Byrne & C. C. Ragin )Eds.(, The Sage handbook of case-based methods )pp. 222– 242 ( . London: Sage.

المراجع 373 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Rivera, L. A. )2008( . Managing ” spoiled“ national identity: War, tourism, and memory in Croatia. American Sociological Review, 73, 613–634. • Robben, A. C. G. M., & Sluka, J. A. ) Eds. ( . ) 2007 ( . Ethnographic fieldwork: An anthropological reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell. • Robertson, L. C., Knight, R. T., Rafal, R., & Shimamura, A. P . )1993(. Cognitive psychology is more than single-case studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 710– 717. • Rog, D. J., & Huebner, R. B. )1992(. Using research and theory in developing innovative programs for homeless individuals. In H. T. Chen & P . Rossi )Eds.(, Using theory to improve program and policy evaluations )pp. 129– 144 ( . New York: Greenwood. • Rog, D. J., & Randolph, F. I. ) 2002 ( . A multisite evaluation of supported housing: Lessons from cross-site collaboration. New Directions for Evaluation, 94, 61–72. • Rogers, E. M., & Larsen, J. K. )1984(. Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high-technology culture. New York: Basic Books. • Rogers, P . J. )2000( . Program theory: Not whether programs work but how they work. In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kelleghan ) Eds. ( , Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation )2nd ed., pp. 209– 232 ( . Boston: Kluwer. • Rogowski, R. )2010( . How inference in the social ) but not the physical ( sciences neglects theoretical anomaly. In H. Brady & D. Collier )Eds.(, Rethinking social inquir y: Diverse tools, shared standards )2nd ed., pp. 89– 97 ( . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. • Rolls, G. )2005(. Classic case studies in psychology. Abingdon, England: Hodder Education. • Rosenbaum, D. P . )Ed.(. )1986( . Community crime prevention: Does it work? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Rosenbaum, P . R. )2002(. Observational studies )2nd ed.(. New York: Springer. • Rosenthal, R. )1966(. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts. • Rossi, P ., Lipsey, M. W ., & Freeman, H. E. )2004(. Evaluation: A systematic approach )7th ed.(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. )1993(. Research methods for social work. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. • Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. )2011(. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data )3rd ed.(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Ruddin, L. P . )2006(. You can generalize stupid! Social scientists, Bent Flyvb jer g, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 797–812. • Saldaa, J. )2009(. The coding manual for qu alitative researchers. London: Sage.

المراجع 374 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Schatzman, L., & Strauss, A. )1973(. Field research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. • Schein, E. )2003(. DEC is dead, long live DEC: Lessons on innovation, technology, and the business gene. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. • Schlesselman, J. J. )1982(. Case-control studies: Design, conduct, analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. • Schorr, L. B. )1997(. Common purpose: Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America. New York: Anchor. • Schramm, W . )1971, December(. Notes on case studies of instructional media pro je cts. Working paper for the Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC. • Schwandt, T. A. )2007(. The Sage dictionary of qu alitative inquiry ) 3rd ed. ( . Los Angeles: Sage. • Schwandt, T. A. )2009(. Toward a practical theory of evidence for evaluation. In S. I. Donaldson, C. A. Christie, & M. M. Mark )Eds.(, What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? ) pp. 197–212 ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Scoville, W . B., & Milner, B. )1957(. Loss of recent memory in bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 20, 11– 22. • Scriven, M. ) 2009 (. Demythologizing causation and evidence. In S. I. Donaldson, C. A. Christie, & M. M. Mark )Eds.(, What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? )pp. 134– 152 ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Sears, D. O. )1986( . College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515– 530. • Selznick, P . )1980(. TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press. )Original work published 1949( • Shavelson, R., & Towne, L. )Eds.(. )2002(. Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. • Sidman, M., Soddard, L. T., & Mohr, J. P . )1968(. Some additional q u antitative observations of immediate memory in a patient with bilateral hippocampal lesions. Neuropsychologia, 6, 245– 254. • Sidowski, J. B. )Ed.(. ) 1966 ( . Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. • Silverman, D. )2010(. Doing qu alitative research: A practical handbook ) 3rd ed. ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Small, M. L. )2004(. Villa Victoria: The transformation of social capital in a Boston barrio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

المراجع 375 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Small, M. L. )2009( . ” How many cases do I need? “ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10, 5–38. • Smith, J. ) Ed. ( . ) 2008 ( . Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods ) 2nd ed. ( . London: Sage. • Speiglman, R., & Spear, P . )2009(. The role of institutional review boards: Ethics: Now you see them, now you don’t. In D. M. Mertens & P . E. Ginsberg ) Eds. ( , The handbook of social research ethics )pp. 121– 134 ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Spilerman, S. )1971(. The causes of racial disturbances: Tests of an explanation. American Sociological Review, 36, 427– 442. • Stake, R. E. ) 2005( . Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln ) Eds. ( , The Sage handbook of qualitative research ) 3rd ed., pp. 443–466 ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Stake, R. E. )2006(. Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford. • Standerfer, N. R., & Rider, J. )1983(. The politics of automating a planning office. Planning, 49, 18–21. • Stein, H. )1952(. Case method and the analysis of public administration. In H. Stein )Ed.(, Public administration and policy development )pp. xx–xxx(. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. • Stoecker, R. )1991(. E valuating and rethinking the case study. The Sociological Review, 39, 88–112. • Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. ) 2007 ( . Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. )1982(. Asking q ue stions: A practical guide to q uestionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Supovitz, J. A., & Taylor, B. S. )2005(. Systemic education evaluation: Evaluating the impact of systemwide reform in education. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 204– 230. • Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. )1995(. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 371– 384. • Szanton, P . )1981(. Not well advised. New York: Russell Sage Foundation and The Ford Foundation. • Tawney, J. W ., & Gast, D. L. )1984( . Single sub ject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill. • Teske, P ., Schneider, M., Roch, C., & Marschall, M. )2000(. Public school choice: A status report. In D. Ravitch & J. P . Viteritti )Eds.(, Lessons from New York City schools )pp. 313– 338 ( . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. • Thacher, D. )2006(. The normative case study. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1631– 1676.

المراجع 376 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Towl, A. R. )1969(. To study administrations by cases. Boston: Harvard University Business School. • Trochim, W . )1989(. Outcome pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12, 355–366. • United Nations Development Programme. )2010(. Evaluation of UNDP contribution to strengthening national capacities. New York: Evaluation Office. • U.S. Government Accountability Office, Program Evaluation and Methodology Division. )1990(. Case study evaluations. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. • U.S. National Commission on Neighborhoods. ) 1979 ( . People, building neighborhoods. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. • U.S. Office of Technology Assessment. ) 1980–1981( . The implications of cost effectiveness analysis of medical technology: Case studies of medical technologies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. • Van Maanen, J. )1988(. Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • Vaughan, D. )1992(. Theory elaboration: The heuristics of case analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. D. Becker ) Eds. ( , What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social in quiry ) pp. 173–202 ( . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. • Vaughan, D. )1996( . The Challenger launch decision: Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • Veerman, J. W ., & van Yperen, T. A. )2007(. Degrees of freedom and degrees of certainty: A developmental model for the establishment of evidence-based youth care. Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, 212– 221. • Vertue, F. M. )2011( . Applying case study methodology to child custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 49, 336–347. • Vissak, T. )2010(. Recommendations for using the case study method in international business research. The Qualitative Report, 15, 370–388. • Warner, W . L., & Lunt, P . S. )1941(. The social life of a modern community. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. • Wax, R. )1971(. Doing field work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. • Weiss, R. S. )1994(. Learning from strangers: The art and method of qu alitative interview studies . New York: The Free Press. • Wertz, F. J., Charmaz, K., McMullen, L. M., Josselson, R., Anderson, R., & McSpadden, E. )2011(. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse

المراجع 377 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York: Guilford. • Wholey, J. )1979(. Evaluation: Performance and promise. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. • Whyte, W . F. )1993(. Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian slum ) 4th ed. ( . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. )Original work published 1943(. • Wilford, J. N. )1992(. The mysterious history of Columbus. New York: Vintage. • Wilson, R. F. )Ed.(. )1982(. Designing academic program reviews ) New Directions for Higher Education, No. 37(. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Windsor, D., & Greanias, G. ) 1983 ( . The public policy and management program for case/course development. Public Administration Review, 26, 370–378. • Wolcott, H. F. )2009(. Writing up qu alitative research ) 3rd ed. ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Wolf, P . )1997(. Why must we reinvent the federal government? Putting historical developmental claims to the test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3, 358–388.

378 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Yardley, L. )2009(. Demonstrating validity in qu alitative psychology. In J. A. Smith ) Ed. ( , Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research method )pp. 235– 251 ( . Los Angeles: Sage. • Yin, R. K. )1978(. Face perception: A review of experiments with infants, normal adults, and brain injured persons. In R. Held, H. Liebowitz, & H.-L. Teuber ) Eds. ( , Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. VIII. Perception )pp. 593– 608 ( . New York: Springer-Verlag. • Yin, R. K. )1980(. Creeping federalism: The federal impact on the structure and function of local government. In N. J. Glickman )Ed.(, The urban impacts of federal policies ) pp. 595–618 ( . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. • Yin, R. K. )1981a(. The case study as a serious research strategy. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 3, 97–114. • Yin, R. K. ) 1981b ( . The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58–65. • Yin, R. K. )1981c(. Life histories of innovations: How new practices become routinized. Public Administration Review, 41, 21–28. • Yin, R. K. )1982a(. Conserving America’s n eighborhoods. New York: Plenum. • Yin, R. K. )1982b(. Studying the implementation of public programs. In W . Williams, R. F. Elmore, J. S. Hall, R. Jung, M. Kirst, S. A. MacManus, et al. )Eds.(, Studying implementation: Methodological and administrative issues )pp. 36– 72 ( . Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. • Yin, R. K. )1986( . Community crime prevention: A synthesis of eleven evaluations. In D. P . Rosenbaum )Ed.(, Community crime prevention: Does it work? ) pp. 294–308( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K. )1994a( . Discovering the future of the case study method in evaluation research. Evaluation Practice, 15, 283–290. • Yin, R. K. )1994b(. E valuation: A singular craft. In C. Reichardt & S. Rallis ) Eds. ( , New directions in program evaluation )pp. 71– 84 ( . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Yin, R. K. )1997(. Case study evaluations: A decade of progress? New Directions for Evaluation, 76, 69–78. • Yin, R. K. ) 1999 ( . Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. Health Services Research, 34, 1209–1224. • Yin, R. K. )2000a(. Case study evaluations: A decade of progress? In D. L. Stufflebeam, G. F. Madaus, & T. Kelleghan )Eds.(, Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation )2nd ed., pp. 185– 193 ( . Boston: Kluwer.

379 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب • Yin, R. K. ) 2000b ( . Rival explanations as an alternative to ” reforms as experiments. “ In L. Bickman ) Ed. ( , Validity & social experimentation: Donald Campbell’s legacy ) pp. 239–266 ( . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K. )2003(. Applications of case study research )2nd ed.(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K. )Ed.(. )2004(. The case study anthology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K. ) Ed. ( . ) 2005 ( . Introducing the world of education: A case study reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K. )2006a(. C ase study methods. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P . Elmore ) Eds. ( , Handbook of complementary methods in education research )3rd ed., pp. 111– 122 ( . Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. • Yin, R. K. )2006b(. Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13, 41–47. • Yin, R. K. )2011(. Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guilford. • Yin, R. K. )2012(. Applications of case study research )3rd ed.(. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. • Yin, R. K., Bingham, E., & Heald, K. )1976(. The difference that q u ality makes. Sociological Methods and Research, 5, 139–156. • Yin, R. K., & Davis, D. ) 2006 ( . State-level education reform: Putting all the pieces together. In K. Wong & S. Rutledge ) Eds. ( , Systemwide efforts to improve student achievement ) pp. 1–33 ( . Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. • Yin, R. K., & Davis, D. )2007(. Adding new dimensions to case study evaluations: The case of evaluating comprehensive reforms. In G. Julnes & D. J. Rog )Eds.(, Informing federal policies for evaluation methodology )New Directions in Program Evaluation, No. 113, pp. 75– 93 ( . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Yin, R. K., & Heald, K. )1975(. Using the case survey method to analyze policy studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 371–381. • Yin, R. K., & Oldsman, E. )1995(. Logic model for evaluating changes in manufacturing fi rms. Unpublished paper prepared for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD. • Yin, R. K., Schmidt, R. J., & Besag, F. )2006( . Aggregating student achievement trends across states with different tests: Using standardized slopes as effect sizes. Peabody Journal of Education, 81)2( , 47–61. • Yin, R. K., & Yates, D. T. )1975(. Street-level governments: Assessing decentralization and urban services. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. • Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. ) 1992 ( . Head Start: The inside story of America ’s most successful educational experiment. New York: Basic Books.

380 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب

381 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب المترجم في سطور د. بركات بن مازن العتيبي المؤهل العلمي: • درجة الدكتوراه في الإدارة العامة، جامعة مانشستر، المملكة المتحدة، الوظيفة الحالية: • أستاذ الإدارة العامة في معهد الإدارة العامة، الرياض، المملكة العربية السعودية. الخبرات والأنشطة العلمية تتركز خبرات الدكتور/ العتيبي في مجالات التدريب والاستشــارات الإدارية، حيث يعمل اتيجية وموضوعات الإدارة العامة بشكل عام، ولديه خبرات واسعة ترمدرباً في القيادة الاســ في مشروعات تنفيذ الإستراتيجيات وقياس الأداء الحكومي. كما تنوعت خبراته الإدارية من خلال عمله كمستشار إداري في مجال التنظيم الإداري وتطوير الأعمال مع عدد من الأجهزة الحكومية، ومؤسسات المجتمع المدني. في الجانــب البحثي، تتجه اهتماماته البحثية نحو قضايا الإدارة العامة حيث قدم عدداً ت المتخصصة في موضوعات تطبيــق مشروعات الحكومة مامــن الأوراق العلمية والترجــ الإلكترونيــة، وإدارة التغيــر، وقياس الأداء الحكومي، وإدارة الأزمات، وتحديات مســتقبل القطــاع العام، والقيادة الإدارية. بالإضافة إلى خبراته العلمية الأخرى من خلال عضويته في عدد من اللجان العلمية في بعض مراكز البحوث الحكومية.

383 بحوث دراسة الحالة: التصميم والأساليب مراجع الترجمة في سطور د. عبيد بن عبدالله العمري المؤهل العلمي • درجة الدكتوراه في علم الاجتماع، جامعة أيوا الحكومية، الولايات المتحدة الأمريكية، الوظيفة الحالية • أستاذ علم الاجتماع، قسم الدراسات الاجتماعية، كلية الآداب، جامعة الملك سعود. الخبرات والأنشطة العلمية يمتلك البروفيســور/ العمري خبرات أكاديمية واسعة من خلال تخصصه في الدراسات الاجتماعيــة، وتقديم الاستشــارات في مجال البحوث والقياس الاجتماعي. وعمل ســابقاً اً لمجلــس إدارة مركز البحوث الواعدة في البحوث الاجتماعية ودراســات المرأة، في عضــو 2017-2016ة نورة بنــت عبدالرحمنرجامعــة الأم بمنطقة تبوك، عام المواقع الإلكترونية القبلية وآثارها على الوحدة الوطنية: دراســة تحليلية"، كأحد ين"مضامــ نايف بن عبدالعزير لأبحاث الوحدة الوطنية، بجامعة الإمام محمد رإصدارات، كرسي الأم بن ســعود الإسلامية في العام ب والطالبات نحو التدخين والمشــاركة في برامج الوقاية منه : دراســة تطبيقية على لاالطــ طلاب وطالبات التعليم العام في المملكة العربية السعودية ية، رفي تأليف فصل ضمن كتاب "الإسكان التنموي"، بعنوان إدارة المجمعات السكنية الخ في عام من جانب التدريس الجامعي، يقوم البروفيســور/ العمري بتدريس مجموعة من المواد لطلاب الدراســات العليا، مثل : مناهج البحث الاجتماعــي، التنظيمات الحديثة، المقاييس الاجتماعية، والإحصاء التطبيقي.

تم التصميم والإخراج الفني والطباعة في الإدارة العامة للطباعة والنشر معهد الإدارة العامة ، الرياض حقــوق الطبع والنشــر محفوظة لمعهــد الإدارة العامة، ولا يجوز اقتباس جزء من هذا الكتاب أو إعادة طبعه بأية صورة دون موافقة كتابيــة من المعهد إلا في حــالات الاقتباس القصيــر بغرض النقد والتحليل، مع وجوب ذكر المصدر.