جهود محمد عبد الله دراز في التفسير الموضوعي دراسة وتحليل

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 487 امدــــاة أضــــح لم يكل يــــ اــــل الحيثيــــاة الم ه يــــ ص دراســــلح لموضــــوقاة الكــــور الكــــه المفكـــ ى لــــ، الاةبــــح "الحامــــاةد"و لهــــها لــــاة يعـــ تجر يئيلــــح ص ا ســــلعاةض بكــــل العوالــــل لال واقــــله الم ه ي المح لهوحله ى الموضوقي . لرنم اهح عا ف له قله ةخ دراه دراساة را ع ص اللفك الموضوقيو لااة لح ضظ اةبه ص الو وك نهل ل اةدب ال للواقفح ال ظ ي لالعمدهي لهمد كل الإضكاةضي المل وق و امدـاة اـاة ل ـــ عاة بـــ ل ال ـــ و للهلر لـــاة بحـــله لد لأ ـــولحو لل ـــله لاة أفكـــاةرا ســـاةب قهـــل هل ـــحو لدراســـاة أق اضحو مماة لأ ث بامـمداة قويـ ص الله راسـاة المعاة ـ ى لهلفكـ الموضـوقيو أل لهفكـ الإسـللي –بامف قاةل - ضوهه بفيهح ل هله و للأه يللأح الل ظ ي و لدراساةلأح الل ي ي ص هها الاةك . والحمد لله رب العالمين.

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 488 ملخص البحث باللغة الإنجليزية Abstract

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 489 Mohammed Abdullah Draz is one of the most distinguished personalities of the contemporary Islamic thought, who employed the approach of an objective interpretation of the Quran, and deepened meditation in it, from which he extracted answers and attitudes as a healing process for the problems of his era, in particular Ethical decay, which took and still taking place in Europe and other places. Draz has left books in miscellaneous areas, with deep vision and impact, saturated in the spirit of the Quran, and seeking its guidance and full theories, first and foremost, "The Constitution of Ethics in the Holy Quran", "The Great News", "The Introduction to the Holy Quran," and "harvest of a Pen". His books dealt with a lot of theoretical dilemmas and problems through the process of an objective interpretation divided into the Quranic theme and the Quranic SURA. A clear and specific methodological features has emerged with Draz, they were distributed among: the assets of an objective interpretation, the methodological rules and Mechanisms, and the temporary or final objectives. The objective interpretation for him is the full vision and comprehension of the heart of the Quranic theme and its branches. Besides, the comprehensive vision of the moral system of SURA, and the detailed plan of the verses -their structure and position, also former revelation and its link with the events described, and showing the literary unity and logic of the Quranic text in both types, then the bilateral reality and the Quranic text start ing and ending. The methodological rules and Mechanism for him also are the proportionality with its modes, statistics and

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 490 classification, disclosure and the collection, substantive and stylistic balance, and then drawing lessons such as the theoretical at titudes, and practical remedies. Draz also paid attention to the Unity in Quran, or in the SURA, and he suggested theoretical concepts to it different from the concepts of an objective interpretation, a difference of section and its origin as a diversity in the methodology, because of the different incompatible two opposite originals, defined that by focusing on the meanings of the coalition, and consistency, good proximity between different meanings and the formation of the full good picture between the miscellaneous elements. He did not refer to the meeting on the core only slightly, prompting some contemporary studies that deny the substantive unity in his interpretative approach - despite that it was achieved theoretically and practically. The goal from Draz attention to the issue of interdependence conversation and the proportional structure is to respond the suspicions of the orientalists against the diviner and miraculous of this great Quran. and then the overwhelming of his literary style on the Qura nic thought concerning the notion of unity and its literary terminology, like unity, coherence, construction and others, in addition to the large number of literary comparisons through the picture… which lead to a disagreement between contemporary scholars, at the level of the transfer of humanitarian concepts from the literary text to the Quranic text. Draz detailed methodology in Quranic studies of the substantive interpretation or the Quranic Unity agreed

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 491 with most of contemporary methodologies, as they were all starting from one intellectual vision recovering the general and total view, besides substantive collection, extrapolation classification, and commitment to reality and text, Draz was creative in some like setting a pre -structural plan, bringin g the logic order, and the notification curriculum according to the rule of education –method and results. Systematic shortcomings also has appeared in many of the features of this detailed methodology, from a lack of extrapolation, and contrary to the hol y book arrangement or downward, frequent aside and exit from the atmosphere of the Quran and the Sunna and Islamic thought in general, because of his expansion in the comparisons at the expense of the textual collection and compilation. Draz cared also abo ut the concept of Unity - in particular at the level of SURA - and he called for a double unity that derives to two twin units: first literary of mutual interdependence construction, and the second: logical objective and moral, being next and the fruit of the initial unit. As a result his methodology diversified in the search for the two units through two distinct plans; he was interested in - through literary unity - by highlighting the faces of the commentary and proportionality between its detailed themes in the interpretation the cow SURA in his book "Great News", he did not highlight the uniqueness of theme in this SURA according to his membership and intellectual engagements, but highlighted this in his interpretation of other SURAS in his book "Harvest of a Pen". We have seen how the concept of exclusivity of the unit

خامسا: فهرس الموعوعا 492 has weakened within its triangular concept of: the association, the force, and exclusivity, also his search methodology for the substantive unity has weakened, so it did not show clearly, and he did not complete research methodology in it, because he has exhausted his efforts in showing the associative membership unity, it was his hope to prove in response to suspicions of the Orientalists, and proof the literary miraculous of the Quran in this aspect. Also he did not mind all the reasoning methodology in his study of the topics of the six interpreted SURAS in his book "The Harvest", and this means his fractionation in the use of all the methodological factors and rules that achieves the substantive unity. Despite all of this, Draz provided wonderful studies in the objective interpretation, and had a fixed view in access to the principles of Quran and its theoretical and practical attitudes of the miscellaneous human problems, as he was imbued with the spirit of the Quran, committed to its Hudud and assets, introducing ideas prior to his time, and studies of his peers, leaving strong prints in contemporary studies of the substantive interpretation, or the Islamic Thought - generally noted - thanks to him, to his efforts, his endoscopic rooting, and his applied studies in this domain. Thanks to Allah, the Lord of the worlds