التبيان في بيان الناسخ والمنسوخ من القرآن لابن الخياط القره داغي

٧٥٢ ــ اﻟﻘﺴﺎم اﻟﻘﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻷﺳﺮة اﻟﺸﯿﺦ ﻋﺒﺪاﻟﺮﺣﻤﻦ اﺑﻦ اﻟﺨﯿﺎط ، اﻟﺼﺎدر ﻋﻦ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺔ ﺑﺪاءة ـ ﺑﻐﺪاد ، ٧٢ / ٨ / ٢٧٩١ م . رﻗﻢ اﻹﺿﺒﺎرة : ٤ / ﻗﺴﺎم ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ / ١٧٩١ .

٨٥٢

٩٥٢ اﻟﺨﻼﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ اﻟﻜﻮردﯾﺔ

٠٦٢ )ﻛﻮرﺗﺔى ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛﺔ ﺑﺔزﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻮردى( ﺋﺔم ﻧﺎﻣﺔى ﻟﺔﺑﺔر ﻧﯿﻄﺎداﯾ ﯾ ﻧﻮﺳ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿان(( ﻛ ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨﺔﯾﺎﺗﻲ ﻗﺔرةداﻏﻰ((ﯾﺔ. ﻟﯿَﻜﺆﻟَﯿﻨﺔوةو ﺳﺎغ ﻛﺮدﻧﺔوةى ﻧﻮﺳ ﻃﺮﻧﻄﻰء ﺑﺔھﺎى ﺗﺎﯾﺒﺔﺗﻰ ﺧﺆى ھﺔﯾﺔ، ﺋﺔم ﻧﺎﻣﺔﯾﺔش ﻃﺮﻧﻄﯿﺔﻛ دةﻃﺮﯾَﺖ ﻛﺔ داﻧﺮاوى ﯾﺔﻛﯿَﻚ ﻟﺔزاﻧﺎﯾﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻮردى زﯾﻨﺪوﻛﺮدؤﺗﺔوة، ﺋﺔم ھﺔو ﻟَﺔش ﺗ ﺑ دةﺳﺘﺔﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻮردو ھﺔرﯾَﻤﺔ ﺋﺎزادةﻛ ﺗ ﻟﯿَﻜﺆﻟَﯿﻨ ﺋﺔﻣ ﻟﺔﺑﺎﺑ))ﻋﻠ اﻟﻘﺮان(( ﻛﺔ ﻧﺎو دةﺑﺮﯾَﺖ ﺑﺔزاﻧﺴﺘﻰ ))اﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ واﻟﻤﻨﺴﻮخ((. ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛﺔش ﺑﺔﺷﯿَﻮةﯾﺔﻛﻰ ﻃﺸﺘﻰ ﺛﯿَﻚ ھﺎﺗﻮوة ﻟﺔﺛﯿَﺸﺔﻛىﯿﺔكء دوو ﺑﺔشء ﺛﺎﺷﻜﺆﯾﺔك . ﺑﺔﺷ: ﺑﺮﯾﺘ ﯾﻜﺆﻟَﯿﻨ دةﺳﺘﯿَﻚء دوو ﻓﺔﺳﻞَ . ﺛﯿَﺶ دةﺳﺘﺔﻛﺔ : ﻛﻮرﺗﺔﯾ ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨﺔﯾﺎﺗﻰ ﻗﺔرةداﻏﻰ(( دا ﻟﺔو ﻧﺎوﺿﺎﻧﺔى ﻛﺔﺗﯿﺎﯾﺪاذﯾﺎوة ﻟﺔ: ﻗﺔرةداغ، وﺳﻠﯿَﻤﺎﻧﻰ، وﺑﺔﻏﺪا. ﻓﺔﺳﻠَﻰ ﯾﺔﻛﺔم : دةرﺑﺎرةى ذﯾﺎﻧﻰ ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨﺔﯾﺎﺗﻰ ﻗﺔرةداﻏﻰ((و ﻧﻮﺳﺮاوةﻛﺎﻧﻰ، ﻟﺔ دوو ﺑﺎﺑﺔﺗﺪا. ﺑﺎﺑ: دةرﺑ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت((و دووان ﻟ رِةﺿ زاﻧﺴ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت((و ﻧﺎﺳﺘﺎﻛﺎﻧﻰ وھﺔﻧﺪﯾَﻚ ﻟﺔ ﻗﻮﺗﺎﺑﯿﺔﻛﺎﻧﻰء ﻟﺔ دوﻧﯿﺎدةرﺿﻮوﻧﻰ . ﺑﺎﺑ: ﻟ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت((، ﺋﺔواﻧ دةﺳﺘﻨﻮﺳ ﺑ، وداﺑﺂى زاﻧﺴ ﺋﯿﺴﻼﻣﻰ ﯾﺔ ﺟﯿﺎ ﺟﯿﺎﻛﺎن. ﺛﺎﺷﺎن ﻓﺔﺳﻠَﻰ دوھ دﯾَ ﻟﯿَﺘﻮﯾَﺬﯾﻨﺔوة ﻟﺔﺳﺔر ﻛﺘﯿَﺒﻰ ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿﺎن((، ﻟﺔ دووﺗﻮﯾَﻰ ى دوو ﺑﺎﺑﺔﺗﺪا:

١٦٢ ﺑﺎﺑ: ﻟﺔﺳ زاﻧﺴﺘﺔو ﺣﯿﻜﻤﺔت ﻟﺔﻧﺔﺳﺦء ﻣﺔرﺟﺔﻛﺎﻧﻰ وﺗﯿَﻄﺔﺷﺘﻦ ﻟﻰَ ىء رِﯾَﻄﺎﻛﺎﻧﻰء رِاى زاﻧﺎﯾﺎن ﻟﺔﺑﺎرةﯾﺔوةو ﻃﺮﻧﻄﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺋﺔو رِةﺧﻨﺎﻧﺔى ﻛﺔ رِووﺑﺔرِووى دةﺑﯿَﺘﺔوةو وةﻵم داﻧﺔوةﯾﺎن . ﺑﺎﺑﺔﺗﻰ دوھﺔم: ﺗﺔرﺧﺎن ﻛﺮاوة ﺑﺆ ﻟﯿَﻜﺆﻟَﯿﻨﺔوةو ﻟﯿَﺘﻮﯾَﺬﯾﻨ ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿ(( و دووان ﻟﺔﺳﺔر ﻧﺎوﻧﯿﺸﺎنء داﻧﺔﺛﺎﻟَﻰ ﻛﺘﯿَ ﺒﺔﻛﺔ ﺑﺆ ﻻى داﻧﺔرةﻛ داﻧﺮاوةﻛﺔﯾ ﺛ ﻻوازاﻧﺔى ﻛﺔ دةﻃﯿﺮﯾَﺖ ﻟﺔ داﻧﺮاوةﻛﺔ . وﺛﺎﺷﺎن ﻛﻮرﺗﺔو ﺋﺔو ﺋﺔﻧﺠﺎﻣﺎﻧﺔى ﺑﺔدةﺳﺖ دةﻛﺔوﯾَﺖ ﻟﺔم ﻟﯿَﻜﺆﻟَﯿﻨﺔوةو ﺳ ﺧﺮاوةﺗﺔ رِوو ﻟﺔذﯾَﺮ ﻧﺎوى ﻛﺆﺗﺎﯾﻲ ))اﻟﺨﺎﺗﻤﺔ((دا، ﻛﺔﺑﺔﻛﻮرﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﯾﺘﻰ ﯾﺔ ﻟﺔم ﺧﺎﻵﻧ ﺧﻮارةوة: ١. ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت ﻟﺔﺳ)٣٥٢١ك – ٨٣٨١ز( ﻟ ﺑﺔﺳ وةك: ﻣﻼ ﻣﺤﻤﺪي ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨﺔﯾﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺎوﻛﻰ، وﻣﻼ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﯿﻀﻲ زةھﺎوى – ﻣﻮﻓﺘﻲ زةھﺎوي- ، ﺧﻮﯾَﻨﺪﻧﻰ وةدةﺳ ﺑ دةرﺿﻮوﻧﻰ ﻟﺔﺳﺎﻟَﻰ )٥٣٣١ك – ٧١٩١ز(، وﻟﺔﺑﺔﻏﺪاو ﻟﺔ ﺧﻮﯾَﻨﺪﻧﻄﺔﻛﺔى ﺧ – ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻃﻮرِﻃﻮرِ - ﻧﯿَﺬراوة . ٢. ﻟﺔﻃﺔلَ ﺋﺎﻟَﺆزى ﺑﺎرودؤﺧﻰ رِاﻣﯿﺎرىء ﺋﺎﺑﻮرى ﻛﻮردﺳﺘﺎن ﻟﺔودةﻣﺔدا، ﺑﺔﻵم ذﯾ زاﻧﺴ زاﻧﺴ ﻛﺮدﻧﺔوةى ﺋﺎﺳﺘﻰ رؤﺷﻨﺒﯿﺮﯾﻲء زاﻧﺴﺘﻰ. ٣. ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت((ء زاﻧﺎﯾ ﺧﺎﻧﺔوادةﻛ ﺿﻮوةﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﻟﺔﺋﺔﺳﺘﺆ ﻃﺮﺗﻮوة. ٤. ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛ زاﻧﺴ ﻛﺮدؤﺗ))ﻣﻨﺴ((ن رِووى ﺟﯿَﻄﯿ )اﻹﺣﻜ(ﯾ ﻧﺔﺳﺦ ﺑﻜﺮﯾَﺖ، وﺋﺔو ھﺔﻧﺪةش ﺟﯿَﻄﺔى ﻓﺮةرِاﯾﻲء ﺟﯿﺎرِاﯾىﯿﺔ ﺗﯿﺎ ﯾﺪا. ٥. ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿ((ى ﺧﺴ زاﻧﺴﺘﻰ ﺛﺔﺳﺔﻧﺪ ﻛ ﺛﯿَﺶ ﻛﺔش ﺑﺔم ﻧﻮﺳﺮاوة ﺑﺔﺛﯿَﺰة ﻛﺮدووة .

٢٦٢ ﻟﺑﺔﺷ ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛ دةﻗ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿ((، وﺛ ﻛﺮدﻧ دةﺳﺘﺨﺔﺗﺔﻛﺔﯾﺔ. ﺛ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿ(( ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛ ﺛﺔﯾﻮةﺳ))ﺋﯿﺒﻨﻮﻟﺨت((ء ﻧﻮﺳ ﻟﺔﺛﺎﺷ. وﺛﺎﺷ))ﻧﺎﺳ((ء ))ﻣﻨﺴ((ة ﻛ ﻛﺘﯿَﺒﻰ ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿﺎن((، وﻓﺔرﻣﻮودة ﺛﯿﺮؤزةﻛﺎن، وﺛﯿَﺮِﺳﺘﻰ ﻛﻮرﺗﺔﻧﺎﺳﺎﻧﺪنء ذﯾﺎﻧﻨﺎﻣ ﻧﺎواﻧ))اﻟﺘﺒﯿ(( داﻧﺎوﯾرﺿ ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛﺔ،و ﻛﺆﺗﺎﯾﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛﺔ ﺑﺔﻛﻮرﺗﺔ ﺑﺎﺳﯿَﻜﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﺔﻛﺔﯾﺔ ﺑﺔ زﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺋﯿﻨﻄﻠﯿﺰى . ھﯿﻮاﻣ ﯾﺔﻛﺎنء زاﻧﺎﯾﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻮرد، و ﺗﻮﯾَﺸﻮﯾﺔك ﺑﯿَﺖ ﺑﺆ ﺛﺎﺷﺔرِؤذﻣﺎن .

٣٦٢ اﻟﺨﻼﺻﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﻐﺔ اﻹﻧﻜﻠﻴﺰﻳﺔ

٤٦٢ studying the book “Exposition”, searching for its title and attribution, the purpose of the author from writing it , its sources, the position of the book in Quranic studies , and the method that the author used in writing it and the personality of the au thor in it , and the drawbacks about the book. The second section is concerned with investigating the book “ Exposition” first by explaining the method of studying and investigation, describing the copies of the manuscript depended upon in the investigation. The first and the last pages of the two manuscripts are photographed . Then there comes the conclusion which includes the most significant results of the research and the facts that the researcher has found in the studying and investigation.

٥٦٢ Summary This thesis studies and investigates a manuscript entitled “ Exposition to Explaining the Abrogative and Abrogated from the Holy Quran “ Written by Ibn Al - Khayyat Al-Qaradaghi. Undoubtedly , the studying and investigating the legacy of scienti sts, especially Kurdish ones, have a special importance. This thesis displays this importance by reviving a work of one of the Kurdish scientists. This work was found in Libraries far away from the hands of Kurds and their liberated region . By this effort, the work came out from the darkness of ruin to the light of publication, study and investigation . The subject of the book has its significance because it deals with a subject of “the Quranic sciences” which is called the science of the Abrogative and Abrogated. The thesis is made up of an introduction , two sections and an appendix. The first section is concerned with studying and made up of a preliminary and two chapters . The preliminary contains a short account of the scientific condition at the time of Ibn Al-Khayyat in Qaradagh , Suleimania and Baghdad areas. The first chapter is about the life of Ibn Al-Khayyat and his works. This chapter is of two themes. The first theme is about the life of Ibn Al- Khayyat, including his name, surname, title and scien tific family. Then there come his birth , his scientific upbringing and status , in addition to the introduction of his master, some of his students, and his death. The second chapter is concerned with abrogation in the Holy Quran and studying the book “Expo sition” This chapter is of two themes. The first theme deals with abrogation in the Holy Quran and explains the importance of this science and the wisdom from abrogation, its conditions and perception among the worthy ancestors and the later scientists, its methods, the opinions of scientists about it and the most important objections and the refutation. The second theme is about .

٦٦٢ Salahaddin University /Erbil College of Sharia and Islamic Studies Islamic Studies Department A -TIBIAN FE BAYAN ANASIKH WAL -MANSUKH MIN AL - QURAN IBN KHAYYAT AL-QARADAGHI A study and an Investigation A THESIS Submitted By Umed Najmaddin Jameel Al-Mufti To the Council of College of Sharia and Islamic Studies in Salahaddin University-Erbil in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of Master Degree in Islamic Studies Supervised by Assistant Professor Dr. Muhammad Sabir Mustafa Al-Hamawandi ٣٠٠٢ ٢٠٧٢ ٣٢٤١